Slovenika XI (2025) 59-79
\nNau\u010dni \u010dlanak
\nUDK: 81’38
\n81’42
\n821.09-83<\/p>\n
Primljeno \/ Prejeto \/ Received: 30. 07. 2025. DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/slovenika.2025.11.1.3<\/a><\/p>\n Melina Nikoli\u0107 Sa\u017eetak<\/em>: Politi\u010dki intervju, kao direktan oblik komunikacije izme\u0111u politi\u010dara i javnosti, predstavlja va\u017enu platformu za politi\u010dare da objasne i opravdaju svoje postupke u kontekstu dru\u0161tvene odgovornosti prema svojim bira\u010dima i gra\u0111anima uop\u0161te. Me\u0111utim, po\u0161to se savremeni politi\u010dki intervju odvija u vidu dinami\u010dnog konfrontiraju\u0107eg razgovora gde intervjuer agresivnim pristupom poku\u0161ava da do\u0111e do informacija od javnog interesa i\/ili zna\u010daja, politi\u010dari neretko pribegavaju strategiji izbegavanja odgovora slu\u017ee\u0107i se raznim jezi\u010dkim sredstvima. U ovom radu \u0107emo iz perspektive kriti\u010dke analize diskursa poku\u0161ati da prika\u017eemo kako se u govoru slovena\u010dkih, srpskih i britanskih politi\u010dara promenom hronolo\u0161kog fokusa mo\u017ee u potpunosti ili delimi\u010dno izbe\u0107i odgovor na delikatno pitanje. Kako je uzeta pretpostavka da se u politi\u010dkom diskursu uop\u0161te ova strategija koristi na sli\u010dan na\u010din i sa sli\u010dnim rezultatima u razli\u010ditim jezicima, analizirani su konfrontacioni intervjui na slovena\u010dkom, srpskom i engleskom jeziku da bi se utvrdile sli\u010dnosti i razlike. Rezultati ukazuju da se, uprkos nepodudarnim gramati\u010dkim strukturama, politi\u010dari u razli\u010ditim dru\u0161tvima koriste sli\u010dnim strategijama da bi izbegli odgovor koji bi ih mogao kompromitovati.<\/p>\n Klju\u010dne re\u010di<\/em>: politi\u010dki intervju, konfrontacioni diskurs, diskurzivne strategije, kriti\u010dka analiza diskursa<\/p>\n —<\/span><\/p>\n —<\/span><\/p>\n Melina Nikoli\u0107 Povzetek<\/em>: Politi\u010dni intervju kot neposredna oblika komunikacije med politiki in javnostjo predstavlja pomembno platformo, na kateri politiki pojasnjujejo in utemeljujejo svoje odlo\u010ditve z vidika dru\u017ebene odgovornosti do volivcev in dr\u017eavljanov nasploh. Ker pa se sodobni politi\u010dni intervju pogosto odvija kot dinami\u010den konfrontacijski dialog, v katerem voditelj intervjuja z agresivnim pristopom posku\u0161a pridobiti informacije javnega interesa in\/ali pomena, se politiki pogosto poslu\u017eujejo strategij izogibanja odgovoru, pri \u010demer uporabljajo razli\u010dna jezikovna sredstva. Pri\u010dujo\u010da \u0161tudija z vidika kriti\u010dne analize diskurza prikazuje, kako se slovenski, srbski in britanski politiki lahko s spremembo kronolo\u0161ke perspektive v svojem govoru v celoti ali delno izognejo odgovoru na ob\u010dutljivo vpra\u0161anje. Ob predpostavki, da se ta strategija v politi\u010dnem diskurzu nasploh uporablja na soroden na\u010din in s podobnimi u\u010dinki v razli\u010dnih jezikih, je prek analize konfrontacijskih intervjujev v sloven\u0161\u010dini, srb\u0161\u010dini in angle\u0161\u010dini mogo\u010de ugotoviti dolo\u010dene podobnosti in razlike. Rezultati ka\u017eejo, da se kljub razlikam v gramati\u010dnih strukturah politiki v razli\u010dnih dru\u017ebah poslu\u017eujejo podobnih strategij za izogibanje odgovorom, ki bi jih lahko kompromitirali.<\/p>\n Klju\u010dne besede<\/em>: politi\u010dni intervju, konfrontacijski diskurz, diskurzivne strategije, kriti\u010dna analiza diskurza<\/p>\n —<\/span><\/p>\n —<\/span><\/p>\n Melina Nikoli\u0107 Abstract<\/em>: The political interview, as a direct form of communication between politicians and the public, is an important platform for politicians to explain and justify their actions in the context of social responsibility towards their voters and citizens in general. However, since the modern political interview often unfolds as a dynamic, confrontational exchange in which the interviewer adopts an aggressive approach to extract information of public interest and\/or importance, politicians frequently resort to strategies of answer evasion using various linguistic means. In this paper, from the perspective of critical discourse analysis, we aim to demonstrate how Slovenian, Serbian, and British politicians use the strategy of shifting the chronological focus to fully or partially avoid answering contenious questions. Based on the assumption that this strategy is employed in a similar way and with similar outcomes across different languages in political discourse, we analyse confrontational interviews in the three aforementioned languages to identify both similarities and differences. The results indicate that, despite some differences in grammatical structures, politicians tend to use comparable strategies to avoid giving answers that could compromise them.<\/p>\n Keywords<\/em>: political interview, confrontational discourse, discursive strategies, critical discourse analysis<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Slovenika XI (2025) 59-79 Nau\u010dni \u010dlanak UDK: 81’38 81’42 821.09-83 Primljeno \/ Prejeto \/ Received: 30. 07. 2025. Prihva\u0107eno \/ Sprejeto \/ Accepted: 11. 12. 2025. \u010clanak (PDF) | \u010clanek (PDF) | Paper (PDF) DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18485\/slovenika.2025.11.1.3 Melina Nikoli\u0107 Alfa BK univerzitet Fakultet za strane jezike Beograd, Srbija nikolic.melina@gmail.com https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9527-4351 Promena hronolo\u0161kog fokusa pitanja kao strategija […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-5813","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","post"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/slovenci.rs\/sl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5813","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/slovenci.rs\/sl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/slovenci.rs\/sl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/slovenci.rs\/sl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/slovenci.rs\/sl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5813"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/slovenci.rs\/sl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5813\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5816,"href":"https:\/\/slovenci.rs\/sl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5813\/revisions\/5816"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/slovenci.rs\/sl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5813"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nPrihva\u0107eno \/ Sprejeto \/ Accepted: 11. 12. 2025.
\n\u010clanak (PDF) | \u010clanek (PDF) | Paper (PDF)<\/a><\/p>\n
\nAlfa BK univerzitet
\nFakultet za strane jezike
\nBeograd, Srbija
\nnikolic.melina@gmail.com<\/a>
\nhttps:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9527-4351<\/a><\/p>\nPromena hronolo\u0161kog fokusa pitanja kao strategija za izbegavanje odgovora u politi\u010dkom intervjuu<\/h4>\n
\nUniverza Alfa BK
\nFakulteta za tuje jezike
\nBeograd, Srbija
\nnikolic.melina@gmail.com<\/a>
\nhttps:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9527-4351<\/a><\/p>\nSPREMEMBA KRONOLO\u0160KE PERSPEKTIVE VPRA\u0160ANJA KOT STRATEGIJA IZOGIBANJA ODGOVORU V POLITI\u010cNEM INTERVJUJU<\/h4>\n
\nAlfa BK University
\nFaculty of Foreign Languages
\nBelgrade, Serbia
\nnikolic.melina@gmail.com<\/a>
\nhttps:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9527-4351<\/a><\/p>\nSHIFTING THE CHRONOLOGICAL FOCUS OF A QUESTION AS A STRATEGY FOR ANSWER EVASION IN POLITICAL INTERVIEWS<\/h4>\n